Jump to content
Mental Support Community

whining thread


Resolute

Recommended Posts

2. Maybe i used a wrong term. I meant laws of universe are always the same. From beginning til now and til.... something. 'Rational' may be wrong term.

3. One can do a lot but it is hard. Few years ago i had ZERO social life, I had so many obsessions with health with some imagined 'world problems'. But today there is still trace of that s**t, but generally I'm much healthier mentally, physically.

I think i just started improving, I built a good base from which i can go on in life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. Maybe i used a wrong term. I meant laws of universe are always the same. From beginning til now and til.... something. 'Rational' may be wrong term.

3. One can do a lot but it is hard. Few years ago i had ZERO social life, I had so many obsessions with health with some imagined 'world problems'. But today there is still trace of that s**t, but generally I'm much healthier mentally, physically.

I think i just started improving, I built a good base from which i can go on in life.

2- i think the word you're looking for is 'order'. i agree, there is absolute order in the universe because chaos and randomness are logically impossible, so "god" couldn't cause them even if he wanted to. and because of absolute order and cause and effect, i believe in hard determinism in the universe.

3- things changing (or staying the same) is part of the determinism of which i speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Res, do you feel everything about life is logical?

i mostly try to base my conclusions on logic, facts, and observations before 'feeling'. as to your question, i must say quite the opposite, it seems that most things in life are illogical (at least i can't see any logic in them), hence my frustration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resolute, do you believe that "everything" is predetermined? Can you go into where you draw the line?

yes, everything is determined because of the laws of causality, and i can't really draw the line anywhere. anything that is not determined implies some sort of randomness somewhere, and the existence of randomness is logically impossible. therefor everything that occurs undoubtedly has certain non-random causes, which makes it determined. this applies to absolutely everything, including "free will", which can not possibly exist; yes the illusion of free will can, and does exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.

a. The one's who don't want to be here. They I believe will have the option to have their wish come true when they die. I believe if you don't want to exist then god will grant you that wish.

b. Well this depends. But I believe how you behave here will determine where you end up when you die.

c. The one's who've passed have learnt one of many lessons to learn.

2. How do you know that most cannot overcome the obstacles being thrown at them? I'd say most people do find a way.

3. Well it is relevant because it's the truth.

But hey, this is just my opinion on things and I'm not god and maybe I'm wrong about the everything.

1- a. i meant the ones who don't wanna be here to begin with. even though granting them this wish after death is better than nothing, it still doesn't justify their initial existence in this world.

b. if you believe in "free will" sure, but what if there is no free will? how is that just/fair?

c. again, in the absence of free will, it's unjust for some to "pass" and "learn" while others "fail" and get punished etc.. as if they hadn't suffered enough.

3- how can it be relevant if we can't know it? besides, how do you know what "god" thinks or believes, is the truth? he could be a big fat liar (evidence of which is very abundant).

i'm glad you're not god; i would have a massive axe to grind with you if you were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your opinion then, if I were to quit my job tomorrow, or if I were to watch Netflix tonight, these things have already been set in motion by independent and uncontrollable variables, and I'm simply adhering to them? I'm trying to understand your POV here, not challenging them.

yes, precisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no need to apologize, beth. :) i'm glad you asked though. the truth is, i only started believing in 'hard determinism' recently, but i'd believed in 'soft determinism' or 'compatibilism' for most of my life i guess (you can probably see the shift in my philosophy from my earlier posts, specially last year). most ideologies/religions believe in the existence of some sort of "free willl", and so did i. the belief in the complete absence of any determinism is clearly absurd, since we all agree that no one chooses their genes, parents, relatives, environment in which they were born (socioeconomic, religion, language, culture, technology, pollution, etc.), and most (if not all) of the circumstances that govern us throughout our entire lives. so some form of determinism clearly and undoubtedly exists; it's just a question of how much. i've long wondered the same thing; what is the percentage of determinism in our lives (in other words, how much "free will" do we have)? and does it differ from person to person?

you asked if something caused this change in my beliefs; my answer is: absolutely! the more my situation worsened, the more i searched for convincing answers as to 'why', and whether there will actually be any compensation for all this misery and inexplicable pain and suffering. i kept thinking and thinking. analyzing, debating (with myself), comparing, and so on... until i came to the conclusion that nothing in existence can logically escape the laws of causality; that notion dictates the logical impossibility of anything random, chaotic, spontaneous, coincidental, or accidental, including "free will". for 'free will' to actually exist, it needs to be exempt from the laws of cause and effect, which is unthinkable; hence "free will" cannot possibly exist, even if "god" wished it. just as "god" CAN'T make 5+6=7 or 8 or 10, or 3, or 54, or... and just like he CAN'T make two contradictions be true at the same time, and, and, and... he CAN'T create "free will" because it's existence is simply impossible.

i have conclusively established the truthfulness of strict determinism (at least for myself), but i have yet to determine whether there is any afterlife, heaven, hell, etc., and whether "god" is 'just' or not (based on human understanding of justice). you might have noticed that if my version of determinism is true, it would make the existence of 'hell' (for absolutely anyone) completely unjust.

thanks for reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some time ago, I may have been able to have a lengthier discussion about all of this with you, res. My intellectual sparring energy is kinda low at the moment, though. :/ I also think I would need to read more about determinism to be well-informed and refresh my memory.

I recall one course I took some years ago (History of Mathematics, I believe) and a question was posed: Was math invented or discovered? I found this fascinating to think about. I could make an argument for each point and did so, but which one is true? Is there one that is true or are both true? The same could be said for psychological theory. I can find truth (from my perspective) in all theories and am able to apply them to different circumstances to come up with an explanation. I tend to lead with humanistic theory, though, because it fits best for me. There are many many ways to look at things...

Does your new belief in determinism bring you feelings of relief or cause you more distress?

Klingsor, I'm sorry you are struggling. :(

Maybe humans wouldn't feel the need to be "supreme" if they felt okay with self as is?

Edited by IrmaJean
adding
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i can't comprehend how anyone can doubt that math was discovered, and not invented. trust me, not even "god" could invent math (or logic, on which everything relies, including math).

i guess you could say that believing in this determinism has both relieved me and caused me more distress. the relief comes from feeling no responsibility for any shortcomings etc., and the distress comes from not knowing what the point is to a completely determined system, and whether or not there is any compensation for all the suffering we go through.

i'm not sure what you mean exactly by 'humanistic theory', but my reasoning is that one can't simply believe in what they hope to be the truth, but rather what can be supported.

there may be many ways to look at things, but only one of them can be right; but of course you believe in relative truth, whereas i believe there can only be one truth.

Maybe humans wouldn't feel the need to be "supreme" if they felt okay with self as is?

easier said than done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...