Jump to content
Mental Support Community

Never getting married


nytaiji

Recommended Posts

The dilemma facing the modern female is does she go for the great sex or the great provider and in the uncommon case of a guy who is both, can she keep other women away from him? Every man they meet is categorized into one of those roles or the fourth - the non players, guys can't earn or fuck well enough. That is the category I fall into, so far anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never been rejected for my size as far as I know. Although I have had a few no call backs after one night. Who knows, it could have been a size issue. I'm 6 x 4.5 The statistics are bullshit though. I have heard from 10 females that I am on the small side of average. And those are just the ones that admitted it. I guarantee there were others that thought that as well. And trust me, I measured correctly. Along the top nbp.

I'm a bit shorter but thicker, more like 5x5. I waited a long time to even take the chance with a woman. The few women I've been with have enjoyed our sex - especially the more experienced ones. My gf loves my penis as it is- she's not settling. So now I have the opposite mindset. I feel like I could approach any woman I want. If I wasn't in a serious relationship now I'd be going after someone else with the confidence I never used to have - though still trying not to be an arrogant ass.

I stuck around here hoping to nudge other guys toward the same revelation about themselves that I've had, but we're all so different. My experience is just what it is, and yours is different for who knows what reasons...age, personality, luck, sample size, perception, etc. But I know one thing. Any girl with me is getting a five-inch cock and I don't care if her last one was eight. They know well how much size varies so five inches won't shock anyone. I think many of them like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are more the animals. But saying that lets take a car for example. Now some men will buy a nice car to impress a woman, but a car didn't exist in nature. But if it gets promoted as this way to attract women, and the women are encouraged to go for a man with a nice car, then it's an excellent way of selling the product. Sex sells as you know, and it's a way of manipulating human mating strategies.

i think the reason women are attracted to guys with nice cars is because it indicates/suggests wealth,which is a trait women are very attracted to in a man.

there have even been studies (maybe not major) on the matter.

they showed women pictures of guys with different cars,and they rated guys with nicer cars more highly,so even if a guy photgraphs himself with a car that's not his own (if women thought it was his) he'd be seen more attractive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what kind of women have you been seeing?

Just normal women - most if you were to ask them would act repulsed and think that you were implying that they were rocking wizards sleeves,but with a bit of time and plenty of lubricant they will easily take a fist ( obviously you can't just make a fist and insert it like that ... It wouldn't go in like that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just normal women - most if you were to ask them would act repulsed and think that you were implying that they were rocking wizards sleeves,but with a bit of time and plenty of lubricant they will easily take a fist ( obviously you can't just make a fist and insert it like that ... It wouldn't go in like that)

i'll leave you to jessie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to echo retro's sentiments. As I have expressed previously I am not a fan of the modern empowered feminist Goddess cult woman, mostly because they are full of doo doo: they get their money from men in the form of fathers, ex husbands, and taxpayers via the State not from anything they have ever gotten off their fat rear ends and done but that said I would caution against over generalizing because their are plenty of guys that are A-holes too.

The bottom line is that people today tend to try to get away with whatever they think they can get away with so avoid anyone you are drawn to because they will liquidate kindness into currency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My God Senior, my fist measures 16cm across, 36cm (about 14in) in circumference. I can't believe a woman could enjoy something that size jammed in her.

Women enjoy being stretched and feeling full, if a woman is aroused enough then the pressure that fisting gives can help produce intense orgasm - there has to be a degree of trust, it's not a move for the inexperienced or a one night stand and it's definitely not as brutal as it sounds.

Never seen it in porn, I would imagine porn fisting to be brutal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you are both right

stats DO have value BUT they CAN be manipulated.

And doctors do exactly that- its called paternalistic medicine which allows 'white lies'.

I posted a clip once where an MD said the average erection in the usa was just over 5 inches- just over a dollar bill- and the women in the audience reacted with open disbelief.

I have witnessed real women state "it just cannot be true" when presented with this claim.

I have read articles from women refuting the claims as a ploy to make guys feel better about themselves

Doctors often quote the UCLA size study as evidence of size not mattering but in fact this study clearly demonstrates the fundamental importance of size to women.

In fact this study shows 'statistically that its impossible for a small guy to find a women satisfied with this size.

The studies that show averages of 5.1-5.5 average ARE flawed- and thats going on the vague measuring details they choose to release with the data.

They dont go into detail about BP or NPB or erection quality of even measurement protocol- its poor science.

The best study was Kinsey because it invited marking a card and tape, postal submission and was fully erect on a large sample.

It also matches condom survey AND womens reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Klingsor

Jessie, if something is published in a respected medical journal, it can't just be blithely dismissed as "poor science", IMO.

I wouldn't say the best study was Kinsey, because that invited people to make a mark on a piece of card - something they could only accurately and comfortably see to do by placing the card UNDERNEATH the erection (regardless of their instructions.) The best study, in my opinion, was the recent one carried out by a US university where the participants didn't even know it was a study into penis size, but rather thought that they were taking part in an anonymous pilot study for custom fit condoms. This ensured that they were real sexually active males, and that they were likely to be truthful so as to be mailed their right condom size. (Condom size obviously = NBP erect size, right?) And, unlike Kinsey, it used a standardised measurement "tool", based on coded letters rather than numbers.

Importantly, the results of this study also broadly agreed with other recent studies. The average for these isn't 5", actually. It's likely to be about 5.6" or 5.7".

As for (your interpretation of) noises made by women in a daytime TV studio, oh please! That has about as much value as whistles and farts from an X Factor audience, doesn't it? Meaningless anecdotery.

RogerJ, I'm not sure if you're aware of it or not, but you come across as singularly condescending and patronizing, more so than anyone else I've read on here. Perhaps it's not intentional, but it's the impression you give.

To dismiss and trivialize is what I would expect from someone who is propping up a house of cards.

Unbelievable hubris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to jessie, roger, klingsor, nytaiji, etc.,

from reading all these posts that are based on studies and/or personal experience, and from my own observations, it seems to me that there's a gap between the actual average of penis size and many/most women's idea of average size. and when it comes to their ideal size, the gap seems to be significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The scary thing is that pseudo intellectual "professionals" of your class and caliber managed to convince an entire country of the necessity and justification for systematic genocide based on colorful biometric charts and "peer reviewed" studies in the 1930's. It's all pseudoscience, quackery, and delusion until it's "peer reviewed" and receiving corporate funding. Then it's unassailable gospel."

That hit the nail right on the head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jessie, if something is published in a respected medical journal, it can't just be blithely dismissed as "poor science", IMO.

I wouldn't say the best study was Kinsey, because that invited people to make a mark on a piece of card - something they could only accurately and comfortably see to do by placing the card UNDERNEATH the erection (regardless of their instructions.) The best study, in my opinion, was the recent one carried out by a US university where the participants didn't even know it was a study into penis size, but rather thought that they were taking part in an anonymous pilot study for custom fit condoms. This ensured that they were real sexually active males, and that they were likely to be truthful so as to be mailed their right condom size. (Condom size obviously = NBP erect size, right?) And, unlike Kinsey, it used a standardised measurement "tool", based on coded letters rather than numbers.

Importantly, the results of this study also broadly agreed with other recent studies. The average for these isn't 5", actually. It's likely to be about 5.6" or 5.7".

As for (your interpretation of) noises made by women in a daytime TV studio, oh please! That has about as much value as whistles and farts from an X Factor audience, doesn't it? Meaningless anecdotery.

- Yes it can actually. The fraudulent autism claims linking in MMR were made in the Lancet- a renowned journal.

There are other famous examples of bad science in all disciplines…. remember 'cold fusion"?

- I think Kinsey is the most reliable BECAUSE it was card marking and they had precise instructions.

The condom survey might be better than some other surveys but would have given a NBP value (5.9 in the Lifestyle condom example ) which is bound to be lower than the 6.4 BP Kinsey example.

So I would suggest the condom survey backs up the Kinsey numbers. They both produced a natural bell curve too.

ps even if we take the condom value as 5.7 I would still stay this supports the kinsey figures.

- The noises of incredulity of a large collection of women when told an erect penis is just over a dollar bill in length may be meaningless to you- but its not meaningless to guys like me.

Its another piece of evidence suggesting the average is bigger than 'just over 5' often trotted out to pacify men.

This drives guys crazy because it contradicts what women and other guys have reported.

So you end up with guys having pride based on a house of cads or deep feelings of being lied too and/or patronised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...