someone555 Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 article here: http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/new-study-probes-average-penis-sizesynopsis: 15,521 men were measured, using stretched flaccid length as erect lengthaverage erect length: 5.16 inchesaverage erect girth: 4.59 inchesaverage flaccid length: 3.61 inchesaverage flaccid girth: 3.66 inchesnow i never bought into this whole "stretched flaccid length" thing, but this study makes me feel better. according to this, my erect girth is above average (everything else still below average lol) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resolute Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 although, like you said, flaccid length isn't the most reliable way to predict/determine erect length, but at least stretching it gives an idea of the erect length, unlike girth, which is a bit more difficult to predict with flaccid penises. it's not like u can stretch penises width-wise, so how in the world were they able to determine erect girth without erections?i skimmed through the study, but couldn't make heads or tails of the exact methods and procedures used. Jessie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
someone555 Posted March 4, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 i'm assuming the erect girth they got with an actual erection. i mean thats the only possible way? is it not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resolute Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 then why not measure the length too, while the dick is still hard ? Jessie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DatDude90 Posted March 4, 2015 Report Share Posted March 4, 2015 Well then, it's settled, I can finally be done with this SPS, and this site. Later fellas ✌️Oh how I wish.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resolute Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 Isn't that a bit gay?not if it's done by female nurses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victimorthecrime Posted March 5, 2015 Report Share Posted March 5, 2015 It makes me feel a little better t0o someone555 so thanks for posting. To be honest and speaking only for myself I really don't care about size any longer. Me having a big one would be a waste. Like putting a flag pole on a condemned building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessie Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 article here: http://www.iflscienc...rage-penis-sizesynopsis: 15,521 men were measured, using stretched flaccid length as erect lengthaverage erect length: 5.16 inchesaverage erect girth: 4.59 inchesaverage flaccid length: 3.61 inchesaverage flaccid girth: 3.66 inchesnow i never bought into this whole "stretched flaccid length" thing, but this study makes me feel better. according to this, my erect girth is above average (everything else still below average lol)this data is such junk science. really annoys me.little test for everyone: measure your junk erect and bone pressed and then measure your junk gently stretched,99% of you will find that your erect value is bigger than your gently stretched value. Some of you will find large differences like me.So the data is baloney.Also one has to ask how they got erect girth from a flaccid dick!!!What utter nonsense.ps i actually looked up the BJU source- its not a new study- its a meta survey of old studies.they quoted their sources and guess what - out of all the studies a minority DID have BOTH stretched and erect measurements.Would anyone like to guess what those studies showed?e.g. Turkey 2002 erect was 4cm bigger than stretched.. jeez what a surprise…. Now- lets address the pathetically low erect girth figure shall we?Only a tiny minority of the studies had ERECT girth data.One of those studies was from a 'sexual dysfunction clinic' in India- a sample of 300 patients.So that would be the girth of 300 sexually dysfunctional men of an ethnicity that some studies have shown to have smaller than averages penises- um ok.so that leaves one other study- guess how many men in that one? Is it 15,000? nope… its 80.And its the Wessels study,,, which gives the lowest values compared to nearly all the others studies over the past 40years.The whole thing is UTTER BS- a total joke. It insults my intelligence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resolute Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 ps i actually looked up the BJU source- its not a new study- its a meta survey of old studies.i know what "bj" stands for , but what's the "u" an abbreviation of? Jessie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resolute Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 little test for everyone: measure your junk erect and bone pressed and then measure your junk gently stretched,99% of you will find that your erect value is bigger than your gently stretched value. Some of you will find large differences like me.what's this "gently stretched" business? you either give a dick a proper tug, or you don't stretch it at all. Jessie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessie Posted March 11, 2015 Report Share Posted March 11, 2015 i know what "bj" stands for , but what's the "u" an abbreviation of? British Journal of Urology…. but I prefer your version…. Resolute 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.