Back again, unfortunately

[TooOld4This]

I've already written several paragraphs in this thread already, and my posts seem to be disregarded, so i'm not sure why i feel compelled to weigh in again. That said:

i too have noticed that in some circles (in my country, it's mainly popular culture, african-american separatists, and movement-feminists) they really take aim at "white people" and especially "white males." (I notice movement-feminists hardly ever refer to "men;" we're only "males." But that's another topic.) Whether "white people" are the object of harsh racial humor, or the putative source of all that's wrong in the world, it seems that verbal abuse is deemed acceptable or even politically astute.

I think these activists and entertainers have a specific type of white person in mind when they scornfully refer to "white people." Here in the USA, that would be the middle-class white suburbanite; the group of people called "bourgeoisie" in other cultures. Well, i don't blame them for ridiculing and resenting that group of people. I've had a lot of trouble from them in my own life. And although i come from their background, i don't share or respect many of their values.

Maybe if we realized that the overbroad pop-culture phrase "white people" doesn't necessarily refer to us, then maybe these jokes and jabs wouldn't hurt so much.

Does that help at all, inf_rad?

[Resolute]

infrared doesn't seem to care about any of that, 4this. his main problem (from what i recall) is the gradual decline (and eventual "extinction") of "white" genes.

[Victimorthecrime]

.

[Resolute]

I am a strict fundamentalist in my interpretation of IR's writing, ok? So here it is:...

are his posts sacred scriptures now? everyone providing an interpretation.

[Victimorthecrime]

rotflmao!!!

[infrared_radiation]

I am a strict fundamentalist in my interpretation of IR's writing, ok? So here it is: white men ARE inferior as documented by interracial porn, the increasingly obvious preference for black men by white women in everyday society, the factually documented decline across the world of white birth rates, and undeniable fact that the entire point of the political Left in Europe and America is the extermination of white men. Given these conditions IR sees no point in living.

That's probably closest to the truth.

1. Porn is just porn. It isn't an accurate reflection of real life, but it still requires real people to perform in it and do the sex acts for the camera. Any time a woman chooses to have sex with a man, the Darwinian process of sexual selection has taken place, even if she's a prostitute or a porn star or whatever.

2. There are a lot of white women who prefer black men, and to some extent other non-white men, in the West today. At least in the UK I am confident that the amount of white women who race-mix significantly outnumber the amount of white men who do.

3. The decline of white birth rates across the world is a demographically documented fact. This is probably the one point here that cannot be argued against at all, as even government statistics say that it is true.

4. There are many points of the political left in Europe and America. Some of their activism I even agree with, such as the right to a "living wage" for working-class people. I also agree with having nationalised health care, education, and so on. I actually support some basic socialist ideas, although I am talking primarily about a more traditional conception of those ideas before the New Left/"Cultural Marxism" thing emerged in the mid-20th century. These ideas have more support in the UK and Europe than in America, which is definitely a more economically unequal society. It is not hard to see how, in the context of such inequality, that ideas of "white privilege" emerged.

One thing the contemporary left certainly believes in is the eradication of privilege, and white people, men, heterosexuals, and so on are viewed as privileged. This is part of so-called intersectional theory, which is basically like a politically correct version of "Top Trumps". Thus, there is a drive to favour ethnic minorities, women, immigrants, homosexuals, the disabled, and so on at the expense of white heterosexual men. The left blames white men for all the world's problems, and openly directs its vitriolic scorn and hatred at them. Some activists, such as one in England recently, have suggested that white men should be killed. It is unclear whether she was being entirely serious or not.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/579411/Bahar-Mustafa-police-investigate-Twitter-post

[infrared_radiation]

I've already written several paragraphs in this thread already, and my posts seem to be disregarded, so i'm not sure why i feel compelled to weigh in again. That said:

i too have noticed that in some circles (in my country, it's mainly popular culture, african-american separatists, and movement-feminists) they really take aim at "white people" and especially "white males." (I notice movement-feminists hardly ever refer to "men;" we're only "males." But that's another topic.) Whether "white people" are the object of harsh racial humor, or the putative source of all that's wrong in the world, it seems that verbal abuse is deemed acceptable or even politically astute.

I think these activists and entertainers have a specific type of white person in mind when they scornfully refer to "white people." Here in the USA, that would be the middle-class white suburbanite; the group of people called "bourgeoisie" in other cultures. Well, i don't blame them for ridiculing and resenting that group of people. I've had a lot of trouble from them in my own life. And although i come from their background, i don't share or respect many of their values.

Maybe if we realized that the overbroad pop-culture phrase "white people" doesn't necessarily refer to us, then maybe these jokes and jabs wouldn't hurt so much.

Does that help at all, inf_rad?

I kind of hinted at that in what I said in my previous post.

In America, there are many black ghettos and Hispanic slums, from what I understand. Although "white trash" type people certainly exist, much of the poverty in America is concentrated amongst the non-white communities there.

Here, things are somewhat different. Yes, there are immigrants and refugees here that are poor, no doubt about it - but most of the poor people here are actually white people.

What's more, here, some people from non-white backgrounds have much more money than a lot of white people, especially the working class and the underclass that lives on benefits.

Not infrequently, I see Africans and Asians driving huge 4x4s (I think they are known as SUVs in America) around and living in nice, fancy houses. Things that many white people do not have. And yet, I am told all about "white privilege". That completely contradicts everything that I see.

[infrared_radiation]

I don't have time to discuss all of this in great detail right now (I am going out soon), but I'll make a few points...

The fact that some people are inordinately wealthy is due to the specific nature of the economy in my area. There's one certain industry that dominates.

I didn't mean to imply that the amount of white people in America in poverty was insignificant. Honestly, I'm sure you know more about it than I do. What I meant to imply was that there are large non-white communities in America living in poverty in addition to those white people that live in poverty.

You claim that the "white privilege/white male privilege" thing is applied unfairly to ALL white men, regardless of their economic or social circumstances. You're absolutely right. Similarly, feminists tend to believe in male privilege. What they are all missing is this: the fact that SOME white men are wealthy and, at least economically, privileged does not mean that all white men are privileged.

Because of the fact that some white men are, at least economically, privileged, all white men get branded as privileged, even though they're not.

This falsehood is a classic example of the Left's reliance on using the wisdom of, say, Marxist theory (which is absolute tripe at the best of times), instead of basic biological principles.

Males vary more than females, for biological/evolutionary reasons. Outcomes are more uneven for men than they are for women. That is to say, the top ranking males WILL be extremely privileged, but the males at the bottom WILL be less privileged than the least privileged woman.

The Left doesn't recognise this simple biological principle. Instead, it sees structural systems of oppression, race and gender being social constructs that were created in order to allow the domination of one group over another. This ties in with the idea of intersectionality and privilege.

This is why Marxist-type people say "only white people can be racist" and "sexism against men cannot exist" because they believe that discrimination equals power plus prejudice, and in intersectional theory, white people, men and.heterosexuals are privileged over others. Which is FUCKING HORSESHIT because it contradicts biology including the theories of Darwin for reasons I've already hinted at, but it's what they believe.

The whole debate is a battle between Social Darwinism (the truth) and Cultural Marxism (the bullshit that the left-wing media and governments in the West feed their citizens every day).

See this:

http://www.heretical...wilson/mbc.html

That whole site has lots of interesting info on it. Lots of stuff about race, sex, biology, etc.

I'm away out tonight to try and enjoy myself. See ya.

[infrared_radiation]

Yet these are the very people who claim, above all else, to be "rational". And don't make the mistake of thinking they're too stupid to realize it. What does this tell you?

I'm not going to contribute any more to this topic because it's clear to me that whatever is causing you so much angst, IR, it is entirely within your own power to cure it. You have demonstrated to me that you have a grasp on the reality of the situation, yet you refuse to answer my questions in posts 115 and 117. I can't help but keep referring to the title of your original thread, "Problem With Porn, One Specific Genre"; to me, the answer to your problems is hidden in that very title. I had wondered when I first started reading your old thread if you were a high level troll, but I don't think that's the case.

I will only say this: I would kill to have what you have, and so would many others. While I will face yet another Friday night of boredom, isolation, and sexless diversion, you will no doubt be out having fun, talking to women, and only disinclining to take them to bed because you yourself have the problem, not the women. And please don't suggest that these men who are obsessed over penis size are "base" or "trashy". I can only again reference the title of your original thread, which tells me the issue isn't about demographic decline (at least not directly), it has everything to do with interracial sex.

I hope things improve for you.

Take care.

I did answer the question in #115, and said it was due to the economy of the region I live in.

In #117 I don't fully understand the question.

You say that I will be "no doubt be out having fun, talking to women, and only disinclining to take them to bed because you yourself have the problem, not the women".

Which is so off the mark, that it would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad. No, I'm back home again, it's now 11pm and I'm sitting in doing nothing in particular except typing this right here.

What do I have, that you would "kill to have"? Is it something to do with penis size? To be honest, I'd say my penis is probably between 7-8 inches erect. It's not that huge, even if it is definitely above average.

The majority of women are not THAT concerned about penis size. The minority that are particularly concerned with it are sex-obsessed, shallow, and - yes - slutty.

[infrared_radiation]

And here's a fact: HAVING A BIG PENIS WILL NOT GET YOU LAID.

I hope everyone in that small penis size forum is reading this post and taking it into account, too.

[infrared_radiation]

To outline, broadly speaking, what I meant about the clash of ideologies between Social Darwinism and Cultural Marxism...

Cultural Marxism = all can be made equal, if inequality exists, those groups who have more must give up their "privileges"

Social Darwinism = equality is a joke, it's about survival of the fittest, and natural selection

An "equal" society cannot exist, because unequal levels of genetic/racial reproduction would exist both for people as individuals, and between racial groups

http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2002/toa-s14d.html

Males substitute for sex anything which builds up to a climax and is then resolved. A very obvious example is competitive sport, which combines the instincts for an accumulation of tension and its resolution with competition. It satisfies both the aggressive and competitive instincts and finally the male is given a ranking, a number, which is a measure of his success.

Anything which involves giving people a ranking or a number implies inequality. Anything that is competitive implies inequality, like Darwinistic reproductive competition.

[infrared_radiation]

Forget it. Your problem is the one problem that I don't have and never will, so it's none of my concern. Sorry for intruding.

What is my problem?

My mental health?

The fact that I - supposedly - am on the autistic spectrum? Even though I cope quite well in life with most things...

[infrared_radiation]

Also, you'd wondered whether I was a high level troll when you first saw my old thread.

Well... no, I'm not a troll, because I'm being honest and genuine about what I feel.

The word 'troll' gets bandied about on the internet an awful lot, despite the fact that 'troll' and 'trolling' have no clear-cut definition. The meaning of the terms 'troll' and 'trolling' in an internet context is inherently ambiguous.

Is anyone who is not genuine on the Internet a troll? What about those who adopt online personas for any particular reason they choose? There could be any number of reasons why someone would wish to do that.

What about people writing from a fictional or satirical perspective? Is that trolling?

Or are trolls only those who set out to be deliberately malicious, either trying to upset people, or trying to waste people's time?

And how do you know if someone is a troll, or is genuine?

'Troll' and 'trolling' are among the most ambiguous and difficult to define terms that are used on the internet. At least in the UK, some 'trolls' have actually been prosecuted for their online activities. But there is no legal definition of trolling. There's online harassment, there's "computer misuse", but no legal definition of trolling exists and it would be futile to attempt to define the term given its inherently ambiguous nature for reasons I've already explained.

[infrared_radiation]

I thought you were here because you had a mental health concern for which you were seeking support or help, which I attempted to provide through reasoned arguments that might not have been available to you elsewhere and in other circumstances. However, the quote above combined with the fact that you agree with many of my points on the realities of this issue leaves me clueless as to what you're actually seeking by posting here.

If the goal is merely to have a place to fume without any possibility of ever listening to anything that contradicts your views or offers a reasoned path out of mental anguish, then all I can say is, "cheers"; however, I would have thought that such a perspective would have belonged more on Stormfront than a mental health forum. That's what I originally wanted when I began posting in the Small Penis Forum, but, unfortunately, far too many men out there don't want to hear my bullshit, yet they continually visit a support forum for men with small penises. Go figure.

I don't think you're a troll, I just think I've wasted my time here and stupidly allowed myself to be drawn into something for which I had no business providing comments in the first place because I will never suffer from this particular delusion.

Goodnight.

I've had enough of this shit too for one night, goodnight.

[TooOld4This]

This thread was supposed to be, like the others, a place to give and receive comfort.

Instead it's devolved into a political argument.

Inf_rad, i took a little offense at what you've written about my country

(we Americans are a nationalistic lot, as you've heard),

but i didn't push back on that issue because we're here to heal.

So it's unfortunate that we're in this "all the leftists hate white guys" rant.

All i really wanted to say, way back at the beginning, was: nobody's race is bad, nobody's race is ugly, nobody's race is weak, nobody's race is stupid. I'm not ashamed of being white, and no brother should be ashamed of being black. We're OK as we are.

So are you, inf_rad.

[infrared_radiation]

Yes, but there's one point here: black men are winning over white men left, right and centre. White men are the LAUGHING STOCK OF THE WORLD because SO MANY WHITE WOMEN PREFER BLACK MEN.

Putting aside the issue of porn for the moment, let's just casually survey real life...

Thursday, on my drive home from work, saw one white woman with mixed-race children.

Friday (yesterday), on my drive home from work, saw two white women with mixed-race (presumably) grandchildren. Because, you know, just one wouldn't have been enough!

The other week, I saw a black man in a shop with two obviously mixed-race children.

I lose count of the amount I see. I see evidence of black male/white female mixing EVERY DAY ALMOST if I'm out and about in the city.

There is absolutely NO WAY white men have the same levels of success with non-white women. Nothing even like it. Yes, you do get a few, but it's just not on the same level.

You say nobody's race is weak. That's absolute nonsense. White people (really just white men, because women LOVE to submit and be vanquished) are in a weak position. Firstly, because of the established demographic fact of the white race's terminal decline on a global scale. Secondly, because white men are losing potential mates (white women) to black and other non-white men, a proportion of them will be unable to reproduce, or find sex or love, because of the increased competition resulting from this loss. An appropriate name for this process is "cultural cuckoldry".

It's just yet another example of feel-good, politically correct sentiment that values emotionalism over truth. I will NEVER value emotionalism over truth.

So I'll say it again: WHITE MEN ARE THE LAUGHING STOCK OF THE WORLD.

Yes some women are attracted to white men, but it's an evolutionarily anachronistic process for reasons I've already explained countless times and yet no one ever seems to be listening. It is a mismatch between instincts and (demographic/social) reality.

Why should I live my life in a body I hate? WHY?

[infrared_radiation]

The only way in which what I have described would NOT make white men in a weak position, would be if everything to do with sex, reproduction (and yes, evolution) were deemed to be of null importance. If cultural cuckoldry is equality, then it is equality in sterility.

EQUALITY IN STERILITY! That's the situation that white men find themselves in: considered to be equal members of society, but also EUNUCHS as well.

You can explain that equalty doesn't exist in nature, but you won't be listened to. People don't WANT to hear the truth. They prefer to feel good and believe lies.

One characteristic of political fascism is its impotence. Any attempts by white men to revolt against the situation they find themselves in are feeble and even more laughable than the people themselves.

WHY WAS I BORN TO BE HUMILIATED?

WHY?

WHY COULD I JUST NOT HAVE BEEN A BLACK MAN INSTEAD?

[IrmaJean]

I would often post and have rants about how I felt. My arguments kept on going round in circles. Again and again and again, the same things over and over again, and it got me absolutely nowhere but into an even deeper psychological rut.

My intention in creating this thread is NOT to repeat what I did in the last thread. If I do start ranting away like I did the last time, please stop me.

It is simply to try to seek a solution to my mental health issues and to get me "mentally healthy" again.

Yes. Since around 2007, I've had problems with alcohol (although I stopped the alcohol around the end of 2011), losing my mother, being diagnosed with autism, dropping out of university, all the rest of it. I've had quite a lot of mental health issues and I do get paranoia about my physical health, despite being reassured that there's nothing wrong with me.

Things are on the up again for me though. I am in full time employment. I am keeping on top of everything in that regard and managing most things in my life.

But I don't have many friends, or a good social life, and my attempts at dating usually seem to fail.

I also get embarrased by the things I said or did when I was drunk in the past. I also talk to myself, probably as a nervous habit. I wish I wouldn't but it's anxiety based.

Actually, it isn't just the things I did when I was drunk. It's pretty much everything. I feel ashamed of almost everything I've ever done; that's how much I hate myself.

Maybe it helps to focus on the difficulties you are having in your life now?

Have you ever felt obsessed about any other subject or only this one in particular?

[infrared_radiation]

Maybe it helps to focus on the difficulties you are having in your life now?

Have you ever felt obsessed about any other subject or only this one in particular?

Before I had a complex about race, I used to have a complex about age. This is going back a long time ago, between the ages of about 17-19 or so (a time when I did not have a complex about race). Particularly, I felt that all the "older" guys were stealing all the "younger" girls. As I got older myself, and still didn't have much success with women, this psychological complex disappeared, and I realised that it wasn't age that was the issue.

Certainly by the age of 22, a complex about race had definitely developed. I will admit that online porn and also racist websites on the internet had influenced my thoughts at this time, but it wasn't only that. It was also seeing the amount of immigrants, particularly black people, that were arriving in my city in huge numbers, that concerned me. At first I was racist, and I did have extremely racist views for a while, maybe even 3 years or so, but after seeing the complete futility in having those views and the political impotence of neo-fascism, my views changed again.

The hatred that I had, largely turned inward, directed at the self instead of others. And that is how I got to the position I am in today.

[infrared_radiation]

Another thing is that I've never had any particularly strong male figures to identify with. I've always been quite distant from my father personality wise. He is very different from me in many ways. I take after my mother's side of the family. Actually, my dad and some of his brothers have been said to look Italian or Greek with dark features, and his mother (my grandmother), who is still alive, doesn't know who her father was as she was born out of wedlock, and she thinks that he was an immigrant of some kind probably from Southern Europe, probably Italy, and she had dark features when she was young, although she has no way of knowing for sure.

My mother's maiden name was a Scottish name of probable Scandinavian origin, interestingly, which is also a place name in north-east Scotland. Most Scottish place names derive from Gaelic, although a few have Scandinavian/Norse origins.

When that guy Anders Breivik went and murdered all those kids in Norway four years ago I was shocked, not only by the brutality of the act, but also by how similar a type of guy he was to me, personality wise. I really felt that I had loads in common with him in terms of the type of person I was, and it got to me a bit. When you see parts of your own personality reflected in that of a mass murderer, you know it's time to change.

To a certain extent, it was at that point that I started to see how ridiculous it was to have racist views. It was maybe at that point, that the self-hatred began to start. If not directly after that, at least within the few years after it. By 2013, when I first joined this site, my racist views were fading, and it seemed to turn into self hatred quite rapidly.

[infrared_radiation]

I would say, probably, that I had racist views starting in about 2008 or 2009, and finishing in about 2013 or 2014.

What I have now is a sort of "post-racist" self-hatred.

[infrared_radiation]

I will also say something else: there seems to be a belief on here that I masturbate on a regular basis to pornography of black men having sex with white women.

That is actually false.

[infrared_radiation]

Within reason, I don't have a problem with being told what to do, at least in certain contexts. If it's a reasonable request.

One thing that makes me absolutely enraged, however, is being told what NOT to do. NO ONE TELLS ME WHAT NOT TO DO.

I DON'T GIVE A FUCK if something is against the law. I despise the police, for the most part.

You know one thing I can't stand? Paedo-hysteria. The assumption that all men are potential paedophiles. I have even lied before and told people on internet forums that I was a paedophile, just to deflect attention away from the whole issue with race.

[infrared_radiation]

Well, today did not disappoint!

2 black male/white female couples spotted. Both blonde females. One was very attractive.

I also spotted 2 white males with non-white females, but who cares...

[Resolute]

I also spotted 2 white males with non-white females, but who cares...

lmao.