Jump to content
Mental Support Community

females views etc (Trigger Warning!)


Jessie

Recommended Posts

Seems girls tend to exagerate more than guys in penis size, especially talking about their boyfriends . (because of that trend Jessie just posted above) .

Talking about celebs, I think this semi-stars are more likely to say those things. You don't see Angelina Jolie, Scarlett, or super models who are very beautiful/hot and really big celebs saying this things .

immmm. well some superstars do

eg

rhianna

lady gaga

janet jackson

Heidi Klum

Marilyn Monroe

famous enough for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all of this only supports my theory that existence is nothing more than a disease (an addiction of sorts), and people can do nothing but pursue their next fix*.

* that fix can be anything, such as sex, dominating (or being dominated), beating (or being beaten), achieving, learning, helping others (or being helped by others), using others (or being used by others), accumulating wealth, love, recognition, validation, respect (or humiliation), food, fountain of youth, etc....

Have you read anything on Buddhism such as Alan Watts? What you wrote strikes me to be very much in that vein.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If I was a dude I’d probably have a really big dick, ’cause I feel really good about myself now. So I’m gonna tell those motherf***ers who broke my heart, particularly one, to suck my fat dick and enjoy hearing this song for the rest of your life."

Read more: http://www.thegloss..../#ixzz3vdJZMW7v

Ladies and gentleman - please welcome to the stage…. Miss Miley Cyrus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you read anything on Buddhism such as Alan Watts? What you wrote strikes me to be very much in that vein.

i haven't read anything on buddhism or alan watts to be honest. this is simply my own philosophy of existence (all of existence) being a negative and unnecessary thing, and absolute nonexistence being absolutely positive. if this watts fellow sees things my way, then he's alright in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because society needs men to be like the Oxen chasing the stick extended carrot. They need us to chase all these false dreams and in doing so expend our energies and resources in support of the elites and the criminals together leaching off of us.

Exactly. Your only duty is to buy more and more and more of shit nobody needs or wants until somebody else has it. Then they can't live without it. In this type of society, it's taboo to simply give up because this would deprive the "have's" of a reason to be happy since the "have not's" aren't giving a shit. Your entire well being and self esteem is tied up in what you have that others don't.

You know how I know this? Because in the West, especially America, it's tantamount to treason to "give up". You're supposed to continue to fight, to struggle, to run that rat race, but if you do buy into the hype and continue to play this game, these same people who tell you never to give up will be the first one's to rub it in like salt in a wound when you lose. You're ridiculed and disrespected for being a loser, and you're held in contempt if you simply say "fuck it". The only way to win is to win. That's all that matters in this type of society.

while this is true, the problem is that even the good and decent people (who don't know any better) have also been programmed to condemn "giving up". some of them believe in fairy tale concepts such as that happy endings are somehow inevitable if one tries hard enough, and some just believe that one must keep fighting till the last breath, even if it's in vain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

elizabeth banks, that pretty little thing? i wouldn't have expected this from her for two reasons; 1. her build doesn't suggest such a spacious pussy lol. 2. she seems less openly slutty than the others (if that's possible).

a few mins on a porn site and you will tiny girls taking gigantic dicks with apparent ease. Peri Piper, Kitty, sasha grey etc.

And this kinda talk is not slutty - its MAINSTREAM now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Klingsor

I'm beginning to see this from your point of view and I don't like it. Something I learned a while ago was that a woman instinctually wants to know how her partner fairs in the social hierarchy using any one of the described measuring sticks since it decides her status too. It must be a status that's greater than her own (by way of personal merits or lineage/upbringing) for her to respect him as a man.

The proportion by which he surpasses her prior status is rewarded by an equivalent level of submission she feels for him and offers in return. She also gages his status in regards to the overall social hierarchy for validation, to ensure that her public status is elevated in proportion to the sacrifices that she makes.

Obviously the conflicting force here is that for a long term relationship to work, a woman must hold the interest of her man enough to keep him from temptation provided by other women he is entitled to. I think this competition is what gives this parasitical behaviour it's upper limit. Working backwards, she might ask weigh up her own merits and social status, which tells her the level by which she'll be tasked to submit if she wants "man x". I think it's fundamental for her to maintain leverage over his status by her physical desirability for a long term relationship to work, which needs to at the very least equate to that of other women that qualify for her man. It's this leverage that forces her to operate within her limits though, and why all women don't aim for the most desirable man in society.

It makes me cringe when people cite anecdotal incidents of men of a relatively lower desirability status marrying women above them to have us think we too can trade upwards. That woman isn't the same woman to him, that she'd be to a more desirable man. The ongoing foreplay is virtually nob existent and her lack of submission will surface in all areas of their relationship. He's won himself the right to be her pet, not her man.

More than anything, it seems that our quarrel with a small penis is that it is in essence a set of shackles, hindering our natural social status (should we climb any other ladder) and the merits with which they come. These shackles could be difficult to accept because of the extreme bipolarity with which it rebuts perhaps our intellectual attributes. Hot winds & cold winds are never good together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...